Read Director Bruce Green's welcome letter.
Save the Dates for Three Upcoming Stein EventsMarch 6: Tips on How to Transition from Firms to Nonprofit/Government Entities
Do you work at a firm? Have you been thinking about trying to secure a job at a nonprofit or government agency? If so, you will want to dial in during the upcoming conference call with the following 5 Stein graduates, all of whom moved from a private firm to a nonprofit/government entity:
Gail Eckstein ’03 - from Reed Smith LLP to the NYC Department of Education
Erica Gersowitz ’07 – from Kaye Scholer LLP to the Laura and John Arnold Foundation
Adam Libove ’07 – from Troutman Sanders LLP to NYC Department of Investigation
Nicholas Mitchell ’07 – from Allen & Overy LLP to Independent Monitor of the Denver Police and Sheriff Departments
Seema Saifee ’04 – from Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP to the Innocence Project
These Stein alumni will share their perspectives on how to position yourself to facilitate the transition, what to expect after you make the move, and why you might want to consider undertaking a career change. There will also be time during the call for you to pose your own questions to the speakers.
The call will take place from 12:30-1:30 p.m on Thursday, March 6. To participate in the call, RSVP to Sherri Levine. You will be provided with a call-in number prior to the date of the event.
March 20: CLE Program on Ethical Issues Confronting In-House Counsel
Are you in-house counsel or outside corporate counsel who works with in-house counsel? Then this upcoming CLE program is for you. Ethics for In-House Counsel: New Developments and Future Challenges is a daylong CLE program scheduled for Thursday, March 20 from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. in the E. Gerald Corrigan Conference Center on the 12th Floor of Lowenstein.
Earn 4 ethics CLE credits while learning about such issues as conflicts (including advanced waivers, affiliate/subsidiary conflicts, and business conflicts), candor and truth in the context of negotiations and drafting, the role of the Upjohn decision during employee interviews, and new ethical developments in law and practice.
April 7: Hot Topics - Family and Children's Rights: Challenges, Accomplishments, and Emerging Issues
Stacy Charland '04 - Staff Attorney at Bronx Defenders
The panel will begin at 7:00 p.m. and conclude with a reception, to allow plenty of time for networking and community-building. The panel discussion and reception will take place at Fordham Law School in Room 430 B/C.
New Stein Alumni-to-Alumni Mentorship Program Launched!The Stein Center has launched a new program: the Stein Alumni-to-Alumni Mentorship Program. Mentoring isn’t just for soon-to-be lawyers or very new lawyers—even experienced attorneys can benefit from relationships with peers in order to learn about new areas of law, improve their practice and/or gain advice on such issues as career transitions and work/family balance.
If you are a Stein alum and would like to be matched with a more senior or experienced Stein graduate, please fill out this short survey.
If you are a Stein alum and would like to mentor a fellow Stein graduate, please fill out this short survey.
When you sign up, you will be asked to briefly describe what you are currently doing professionally and either why you would like a Stein alumni mentor or what areas of expertise you will provide as a mentor. In either case, we will do our best to find you a match as quickly as possible!
Fordham-Stein Prize Awarded to Judge WeinsteinThe 2013 Fordham-Stein Prize was awarded to the Honorable Jack B. Weinstein of the Eastern District of New York at the annual Stein Prize Dinner on November 20. Each year, the Stein Center recognizes one individual whose work exemplifies outstanding standards of professional conduct and promotes the advancement of justice.
Following Monsignor Joseph Quinn’s invocation and Fordham University President Father McShane’s greetings, the Prize was presented to Judge Weinstein by Fordham Law Dean Michael M. Martin.
Spring 2014 Advanced Seminar for Public Interest Lawyering UnderwayThe 19 students enrolled in this year’s Advanced Seminar for Public Interest Lawyering are already well on their way to producing useful legal products for five local nonprofit organizations.
Following is a brief overview of the organizations the students have teamed up with and the projects they are pursuing:
The teams’ efforts will culminate at the end of the semester with deliverables for each organization and final presentations to the class.
Stein Center Hosted AALS PR Section Business MeetingThe Stein Center hosted this year’s American Association of Law Schools Professional Responsibility Section business meeting on Saturday, January 4. Despite harsh weather, over 30 PR section members attended the breakfast meeting, which was co-sponsored by the Maurice Deane School of Law at Hofstra University.
Jack Sahl, then chair of the PR Section and Professor of Law and Faculty Director of The Joseph G. Miller and William C. Becker Center for Professional Responsibility at Akron Law, presided over the meeting. He commenced by providing a brief report about the “state of the PR Section,” including developments by the committees responsible for website design, nominations, event scheduling, scholarship, and mentoring. He then presented the Fred C. Zacharias* Memorial Prize for Scholarship in Professional Responsibility to Dana Remus (University of North Carolina School of Law) for her article, Out of Practice: The Twenty-First Century Legal Profession, with an award of Honorable Mention going to Norman Spaulding (Stanford Law School) for The Privilege of Probity: Forgotten Foundations of the Attorney-Client Privilege.
At the conclusion of the business meeting, PR Section members had an opportunity to socialize and network before returning to the AALS annual meeting.
*Fred C. Zacharias, who passed away in 2009, was the Herzog Research Professor at the University of San Diego Law School and one of the country's most noted and prolific scholars on matters of ethics and the legal profession.
Moving the Profession in a Positive DirectionThe New York City Bar Association's Committee on Professional Ethics is chaired by Nicole Hyland ‘02, Fordham Law alum and partner at Frankfurt Kurnit Klein + Selz, PC. The Committee devotes its time to the following three undertakings:
This past September, Alex DeLisi ’14 began serving on the Committee in a volunteer capacity. We spent a few minutes talking to Alex about why he decided to get involved with the Committee and what he has done since he started attending the Committee’s monthly meetings.
Why do you have an interest in ethics?
What have you done since joining the Committee?
Stein Scholars Discuss Crime in NYC – Then and NowOn November 6, the Stein Scholars Program hosted a panel titled The End of Fear City? A Discussion on the Future of Crime and Criminal Justice in New York.
The panelists included Bob Gangi, Director of the Police Reform Organizing Project at the Urban Justice Center; Martha Rayner, Fordham Law Clinical Professor and founding member of the Neighborhood Defender Services; and Walter Mack, Partner at Doar Rieck Kaley & Mack and former Deputy Director of Internal Affairs at the NYPD.
The speakers discussed current contradictions of the criminal justice system. For example, even though crime in NYC has been steadily decreasing, misdemeanor arrests have been on the rise. This has resulted in, among other things, overburdened courts, which, in turn, often makes deliberative, individual justice hard to provide. The increase in arrests has been accompanied by a new New York State cap on public defenders, a development that can only worsen the situation.
Significant time was also spent discussing the changing nature of stop-and-frisk. There was a general consensus that stop-and-frisk has been inappropriately and illegally applied but also some support for the notion that under certain circumstances it could be used as a legitimate police tactic.
The panel, which was introduced by Stein Scholar Jeff Kinkle ‘16 and moderated by Stein Scholar David O’Brien ‘16, concluded with a robust question and answer period.
Stein Alumni in the NewsChimera Bowen ’07, Kaye Scholer litigation associate, was recently named to Lawyers of Color’s inaugural Hot List, which features 100 early- to mid-career minority lawyers under 40 from the Mid-Atlantic region who excel in the legal profession.
Zaid Hydari ‘09 is Co-Founder and Chair of the Board of Directors of the Refugee Solidarity Network, a U.S.-based organization that protects the rights of refugees in Turkey by engaging with and building capacity of advocates in the region. Formed in February 2012, RSN mobilizes financial and human resources to increase capacity of the legal field in Turkey to respond to growing refugee needs. RSN was recently granted tax-exempt status, which will allow it to expand its efforts locally and abroad.
From Stein Scholars Alumni on the Importance of MentorsWe spoke with three alumni from different parts of the country to gain insight on the role mentors can play in one’s professional development.
Ilana Ehrlich ’07
I think a mentor can be defined in different ways, and that one has many mentors over the span of one's career. The person whom I would consider to be my first and primary mentor—Vivian Huelgo—is someone who helped me get started in a field that I continue to be connected to today, despite the fact that I am now doing something slightly different and am no longer in close touch with her.
Ms. Huelgo is currently the Chief Counsel of Human Trafficking, Domestic and Sexual Violence at the American Bar Association, but when I met her she was the Director of the Legal Services Program at Safe Horizon. I met her through the network of Fordham alumni. I had planned to do domestic violence legal services when I went to law school, and through her I got my first law school internship, at the Safe Horizon Domestic Violence Law Project, where I worked during my first summer as well as the following semester. She taught me the basics of litigation in family court, which I continue to use to this day, and helped me understand the dynamics of family violence. She also showed me the level of passion and dedication necessary to work with families suffering from violence and abuse, which is both inspiring and difficult work. It is easy to burn out in family law; the issues you see and the dynamics you encounter are so intimate that it is hard not to feel them in a very personal way. Ms. Huelgo showed me, however, that if you come to it for the right reasons, you can use the law as a vehicle to address these terrible, violent situations and change the landscape of an individual's life.
I now work as supervising attorney at the Center for Employment Training–Immigration and Citizenship Program in San Jose, California, where I manage a team of paralegals and BIA-accredited representatives providing legal services to low-income immigrants. I work with volunteers and interns who are interested in becoming lawyers, and I hope that I will soon have the opportunity to provide one of them with the guidance and encouragement that I was so fortunate to have received at Fordham.
Having benefitted from Mr. Steedman’s mentorship, I have also served as a mentor. Currently, I work at the State Bar of California as a Senior Trial Counsel in the Office of the Chief Trial Counsel, which serves as the enforcement/prosecutorial arm of the State Bar of California attorney discipline system. I prosecute attorneys charged with professional misconduct before California’s State Bar Court. I started at the Bar on July 6, 2004. If you need more information or are interested in aspects of the State Bar of California disciplinary process, read this article I wrote in Los Angeles Lawyer magazine in 2010.
What's New in Legal Ethics?Gideon’s Trumpet Heard Faintly Now
by George Conk
The year 2013 saw the fiftieth anniversary of Gideon v. Wainwright, one of two U.S. Supreme Court decisions that year promising transformation of the criminal justice system. Gideon promised lawyers to indigent defendants. Miranda v. Arizona promised that everyone facing accusatory interrogation would be informed of the right to silence and to call a lawyer.
In the anniversary year, public defender systems were in crisis. Richard Lasnik, a federal district judge appointed a monitor for two Washington State counties; Pennsylvania continued as the only state which provided no state assistance for indigent defendants; and even the Federal Public Defender services were hobbled by the draconian budget measure known as “sequestration.” Immigrants facing deportation still have no right to counsel to defend them in their efforts to remain in the United States. A few will benefit from federal District Judge Dolly M. Gee’s decision to recognize a right to representation for a class of persons with mental defect facing deportation.
Gideon’s trumpet is heard faintly now. The prospect grows dimmer that we will realize the promise of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct. The Preamble identifies every lawyer as “a public citizen having special responsibility for the quality of justice” and urges us to use our “influence to ensure access to our system of justice for all those who because of economic or social barriers cannot afford or secure adequate legal representation.” That noble sentiment runs into enormous obstacles. When the financial crisis struck in 2008, the Federal Reserve reduced effective interest rates to near zero. Interest on lawyers’ trust accounts plummeted. Legal Services Corporation agencies cut staff by as much as half. It is not easy for courts to take firm action today to realize the laudable goals of our profession. They cannot themselves appropriate money, and elected officials faced with mandates may act against judges directly—as in New Jersey where a Governor can, without stating a reason, refuse to nominate for tenure any judge at the conclusion of the seven-year term. In other states, judges face retention elections.
In New Jersey, the Editorial Board of the only statewide legal newspaper has deplored the state Supreme Court’s refusal to review D.N. v. K.M. There, Justice Barry Albin, who has tenure, dissented alone from a denial of certification. The Appellate Division refused to appoint counsel for a respondent in a “civil” domestic violence action. A finding of domestic violence has grave consequences. They include reputational harm, a loss of custody of children, loss of possession of the family home, financial penalties, placement on the offender registry, and loss of the right to a weapons permit—devastating for a law enforcement officer for whom that is a job requirement.
Albin argued that in New Jersey an indigent defendant must be assigned counsel in a civil case if he is facing termination of parental rights, N.J. Div. Of Youth & Family Servs. V. B.R. (2007); tier classification in a Megan’s Law case, Doe v. Poritz (1995); involuntary civil commitment, In re S.L (1983); and contempt for violating a restraining order, State v. Ashford (N.J. App. Div. 2004). But these are relatively narrow swaths of cases. Domestic Violence Act cases, on the contrary, are numerous. To protect women from violence, the laws have made exclusionary orders readily available. One result of this laudable goal is that people, especially in poor districts, now rely heavily on the police and the courts to intervene to resolve domestic disputes.
The timidity of the Supreme Court is understandable, if regrettable. Domestic Violence Act cases are so numerous that it would be a substantial burden on the bar if courts assigned counsel in all such cases. And the appointment of lawyers with little experience or expertise in such matters would likely lead to representation of dubious quality. As the majority pointed out in denying certification, a ruling affording counsel in such cases would be expensive; it would affect thousands of cases annually. But fifty years ago such obstacles did not deter the U.S. Supreme Court. In the current circumstances, we recognize that fewer now than then are prepared to answer the call of Gideon’s Trumpet, as Anthony Lewis called the landmark opinion in his classic book.
George W. Conk is Adjunct Professor of Law and Senior Fellow of the Stein Center for Law Ethics. He is a member of the New Jersey Supreme Court’s Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics. In 2013 he received the Eric Neisser Award for Public Service by Rutgers Law School, from which he graduated in 1974.